×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Review scientific paper

Communication Traits of Architecture of The National Theatre in Zenica

By
Maja Milić Aleksić ,
Maja Milić Aleksić
Contact Maja Milić Aleksić

Faculty of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Geodesy, University of Banja Luka, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Milica Malešević ,
Milica Malešević
Contact Milica Malešević

Faculty of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Geodesy, University of Banja Luka, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Diana Stupar Orcid logo
Diana Stupar
Contact Diana Stupar

Faculty of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Geodesy, University of Banja Luka, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

This paper deals with the communication traits of architecture. This paper mainly aims to analyze and interpret an architectural work upon the theoretical model that is in the function of a methodological procedure, and to point out its communication traits as architectural values. The first part sets the theoretical framework related to the forms and characteristics of architectural communication, while the second part of the paper is conceived as a qualitative study of the communication traits of architecture of the National Theatre in Zenica by Jehiel Finci and Zlatko Ugljen, according to the theoretical setting. The result of the research shall be seen as potential for the application of theoretical, practical and methodological scientific contribution hence theory - based communication in architecture shall be expanded. The same shall be applicable for the critical analyses and understanding of the values of an architectural work, as well as methodological approach in the architectural design.

References

Aleksić, M. M. (2016). Communication Traits of Architecture on the Example of Zlatko Ugljen works, Doctoral dissertation (pp. 56–99).
Bernik, S. (2002). Arhitekt Zlatko Ugljen, Tuzla: Međunarodna galerija portreta (p. 56).
Colquhoun, A. (1989). Modernity and the Classical Tradition: Architectural Essays, 1980–1987 (p. 254).
Eko, U. (1973). Kultura, informacija, komunikacija (pp. 207–270).
Kon, Ž. (2001). Estetika komunikacije (p. 5).
Langer, S. (n.d.). Filozofija u novom ključu (p. 23).
Leach, N. (2006). Camouflage (p. 44).
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1978). Fenomenologija percepcije.
Mol, A. (1977). Analiza struktura pesničke poruke na različitim nivoima senzibiliteta“, у Estetika i teorija informacije, priredio U (pp. 147–173).
Nezbit, K. (2005). Teorija arhitekture postmodernizma”, in Istorija moderne arhitekture, Antologija tekstova, Knjiga 3, Tradicija modernizma i drugi modernizam (pp. 345–387).
Pallasmaa, J. (2005). The Eyes of the Skin: Architecture and the Senses (p. 64).
Pallasmaa, J. (2014). Space, place and atmosphere. Emotion and peripheral perception in architectural experience”. In Architectural Atmospheres, On the Experience and Politics of Architecture (pp. 18–42).
Šuvaković, М. (2005). Pojmovnik suvremene umjetnosti (p. 367).
Tschumi, B. (2004). Arhitektura i disjunkcija (p. 76).
Zumthor, P. (2006). Atmospheres: Architectural Environments – Surrounding Objects (p. 13).

Citation

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.