×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Review scientific paper

Assessing the Benefits of Nature-Based Solutions in a Storm Drainage System – a Case Study

By
Žana Topalović Orcid logo
Žana Topalović
Contact Žana Topalović

Faculty of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Geodesy, University of Banja Luka, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

In most developing countries, stormwater drainage practice consists of a conventional storm drainage system designed to collect and convey excess runoff to the recipient as soon as possible, without any attenuation or peak flow decreasing effects. This paper aims to show the overall need for change in the urban drainage paradigm by showing the effects of reconstruction of the existing conventional stormwater drainage system into a new one by including green elements. Part of the existing system is replaced with vegetated swales, and two detention ponds are added in the common green areas (parks). Effects are analysed through a comparison of results from a mathematical rainfall-runoff model for the existing and reconstructed stormwater drainage system for both water quality and quantity at the sub-basin outlet point. The cost-effectiveness of the applied measures is quantified by comparing construction prices for the existing and the reconstructed system. The obtained results clearly show an urgent need for stormwater drainage practice improvement in countries where the conventional approach is still in use.

References

Agriculture, U. S. D. (2009). Small Watershed Hydrology: WinTR-55 User Guide. In Natural Resources Conservation Service (p. 142,).
A.S.C.E. (1992). Design and Construction of Urban Stormwater Management Systems.
Ballard, B. W. (2015). The SUDS manual, CIRIA C753.
Baptista, M., Nascimento, N., Castro, L. M. A., & Fernandes, W. (2007). Multicriteria evaluation for urban storm drainage.
Božović, R., Maksimović, Č., Mijić, A., Smith, K. M., Suter, I., & Reeuwijk, M. (2015). Blue Green Solutions: A Systems Approach to Sustainable, Resilient and Cost-Efficient Urban Development.
Dicks, J., Dellaccio, O., & Stenning, J. (2020). Economic costs and benefits of nature-based solutions to mitigate climate change.
Engineers, U. S. A. C. (1998). HEC-1 Flood Hydrograph Package User ’ s Manual (Issue June).
Group, N. S. U. D. S. W. (2004). Interim code of practice for sustainable drainage systems.
Hoang, L., & Fenner, R. A. (2016). System interactions of stormwater management using sustainable urban drainage systems and green infrastructure. In Urban Water Journal (Vol. 13, Issue 7, pp. 739–758). https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062x.2015.1036083
Huber, W. C., Heaney, J. P., Medina, M. A., Peltz, W. A., Sheikh, H., & Smith, G. F. (2015). Storm Water Management Model User’S Manuel. Version Ii.,”, EPA-600/R-14/413b.
Jiang, C., Li, J., Li, H., & Li, Y. (2019). Experiment and simulation of layered bioretention system for hydrological performance. In Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination (Vol. 9, Issue 3, pp. 319–329). https://doi.org/10.2166/wrd.2019.008
Kimic, K., & Ostrysz, K. (n.d.). Assessment of Blue and Green Infrastructure Solutions in Shaping Urban Public Spaces—Spatial and Functional, Environmental, and Social Aspects. In Sustainability (Vol. 13, Issue 19, p. 11041). https://doi.org/10.3390/su131911041
Manning, M. J., Sullivan, R. H., & Kipp, T. M. (1977). Nationwide Evaluation of Combined Sewer Overflows and Urban Stormwater Discharges. In III: Characterization of Discharges,”.
Marsalek, J., & Viklander, M. (2010). Controlling contaminants in urban stormwater: Linking environmental science and policy. In On the water front: Selections from the 2010 World Water Week in Stockholm (Vol. 2, pp. 101–108).
Milandri, S., Winter, K., Chimphango, S., Armitage, N., Mbui, D., Jackson, G., & Liebau, V. (n.d.). The performance of plant species in removing nutrients from stormwater in biofiltration systems in Cape Town. In Water SA (Vol. 38, Issue 5). https://doi.org/10.4314/wsa.v38i5.2
Parkinson, J., & Mark, O. (2005). Urban stormwater Management in Developing Countries.
Pereira, B., David, L. M., & Galvão, A. (n.d.). Green Infrastructures in Stormwater Control and Treatment Strategies. In The 4th International Electronic Conference on Water Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecws-4-06526
Puddephatt, J., & Heslop, V. (2007). Low impact urban design and development: concept, policy, practice.
Rauch, W. (2001). Mathematical modelling of integrated urban drainage systems.
Rawls, W. J., Brakensiek, D. L., & Miller, N. (1983). Green‐ampt Infiltration Parameters from Soils Data. In Journal of Hydraulic Engineering (Vol. 109, Issue 1, pp. 62–70). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(1983)109:1(62)
Roon, M. R., & Roon, H. (2005). Low Impact Urban Design and Development Principles for Assessment of Planning, Policy and Development Outcomes.
StormNET Technical reference. (2008). In Boss International.
StormNET User’s manual. (2009). In Boss International.
Stovin, V., Vesuviano, G., & Kasmin, H. (2012). The hydrological performance of a green roof test bed under UK climatic conditions. In Journal of Hydrology (Vols. 414–415, pp. 148–161). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.10.022
Strassler, E., Pritts, J., & Strellec, K. (1999). Preliminary Data Summary of Urban Storm Water Best Management Practices.
Topalović, Ž. (2009). Improvement of storm drainage practice in South Eastern Europe.
US, E. P. A. (n.d.). United States Environmental Protection Agency, “SWMM - Stormwater Management Model.
US, E. P. A. (1983). United States Environmental Protection Agency, “Results of the Nationwide urban runoff program.
US, E. P. A. (1993). United States Environmental Protection Agency, “Guidance Manual for Developing Best Management Practices (BMP (Issue October, pp. 1-201,).
Vaze, J., & Chiew, F. H. S. (2002). Experimental study of pollutant accumulation on an urban road surface. In Urban Water (Vol. 4, Issue 4, pp. 379–389). https://doi.org/10.1016/s1462-0758(02)00027-4
Wang, X., Tian, Y., & Zhao, X. (2017). The influence of dual-substrate-layer extensive green roofs on rainwater runoff quantity and quality. In Science of The Total Environment (Vol. 592, pp. 465–476). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.124
Waterways, M. B., Patrnerships, C., Oceanics, W. B. M., & Engineering, E. (2006). Water Sensitive Urban Design Technical Design Guidelines for South East Queensland.
Woods-Ballard, B., Kellagher, R., Martin, P., Jefferies, C., Bray, R., & Shaffer, P. (2007). The SUDS manual.
Xu, C., Tang, T., Jia, H., Xu, M., Xu, T., Liu, Z., Long, Y., & Zhang, R. (2019). Benefits of coupled green and grey infrastructure systems: Evidence based on analytic hierarchy process and life cycle costing. In Resources, Conservation and Recycling (Vol. 151, p. 104478). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104478
Young, B., Hathaway, J., Lisenbee, W., & He, Q. (n.d.). Assessing the Runoff Reduction Potential of Highway Swales and WinSLAMM as a Predictive Tool. In Sustainability (Vol. 10, Issue 8, p. 2871). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082871

Citation

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.