×
Home Current Archive
Author Guidelines Contact
Review scientific paper

This is an early access version

Architectural Epistemes of Housing: Towards an Analytical Apparatus for Reading Individualization

By
Monika Bilbija Orcid logo
Monika Bilbija
Contact Monika Bilbija

Faculty of Technical Science, University of Novi Sad , Novi Sad , Serbia

Editor: Miroslav Malinovic

Abstract

Contemporary theories of dwelling have extended architectural analysis beyond form, function, and typology toward embodied experience, enactment, temporal change, and affective relations. Yet their translation into a transparent procedure for reading architectural evidence remains underdeveloped. This paper develops an apparatus for examining architecture's potential to support individualization, understood as relational differentiation within architectural continuity rather than as personalization or flexibility. An integrative conceptual review and framework analysis synthesize phenomenology, performativity and affect theory into six architectural epistemes: Space, Body, Time, Threshold, Atmosphere and Act. Their translation into guiding questions directs the analysis of published plans, sections, photographs, audio and video materials, and project descriptions. Findings are combined through abductive cross-episteme synthesis to identify architectural mechanisms. The procedure is applied to and demonstrated through Moriyama House (2002-2005) by Ryue Nishizawa. The analysis identifies four mechanisms: 1) dispersing volumes and functions, 2) externalizing circulation and part of the dwelling, 3) overlapping territories, and 4) distributing distances and views. The possibilities these mechanisms offer for autonomy, change, and contact among residents remain conditional on weather, accessibility, privacy, and unequal control over space.

Citation

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.