×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Review scientific paper

This is an early access version

The Effect of Masonry Infill Model Selection on the Seismic Response of Reinforced Concrete Frame Structures

By
Anđelko Cumbo ,
Anđelko Cumbo

Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Geodesy, University of Banjaluka , Banjaluka , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Gordana Broćeta Orcid logo ,
Gordana Broćeta
Contact Gordana Broćeta

Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Geodesy, University of Banjaluka , Banjaluka , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Marina Latinović Krndija Orcid logo ,
Marina Latinović Krndija

Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Geodesy, University of Banjaluka , Banjaluka , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Slobodan Šupić Orcid logo ,
Slobodan Šupić

Department of Civil Engineering and Geodesy, Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad , Novi Sad , Serbia

Žarko Lazić
Žarko Lazić

Depaartment of Civil Engineering , Faculty of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Geodesy, University of Banjaluka , Banjaluka , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

In many countries, reinforced concrete (RC) frames are widely utilized as the primary building structure. The infill is typically composed of traditional masonry (brick elements connected with mortar), commonly without isolation from the frame. It is noted that in engineering practice, seismic force calculations for RC frame buildings are often conducted on models that exclude masonry infill, even when the infill is not isolated from the frame through specific construction elements. In such cases, the walls are considered only as a permanent load. Consequently, the contribution of non-insulated (bonded) masonry infill to changes in bearing capacity, stiffness, and ductility of the RC frame, affecting stresses and horizontal movement during seismic activity, is frequently disregarded. To assess the consequences of prevalent calculation models, four representative types of RC frame models with masonry infill were analysed herein. The study demonstrated that differently conceptualized models of the same building impact dynamic characteristics, including forces and displacements of the main frame structure. The dynamic analysis revealed that inadequate treatment of the frame and non-insulated infill connection in the design phase can lead to dangerous phenomena such as "soft floors," significant torsion, and the effects of short columns going unnoticed. Therefore, this paper underscores the importance of appropriately addressing non-insulated infill in the calculation model in routine design practices. Additionally, it advocates for the issuance of precise instructions for special construction measures that would effectively isolate masonry infill from the frame when such a solution is justified.

Citation

Funding Statement

The research has been conducted within the project "Scientific and experimental research and improvement of educational process in the field of civil engineering, geodesy and disaster risk management and fire safety”, developed at the Department of Civil Engineering and Geodesy, Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Serbia.

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.